真正的哲学问题一定是在哲学史中言说。不存在离开哲学史而纯粹的“原创”。康德要接着休谟说,黑格尔要接着康德说,海德格尔要接着黑格尔说……而所有这些哲学家都要接着柏拉图说。可见,哲学史就是不同时代的哲学家针对同一个问题所展开的对话。如果说《哲学通论》(以下简称《通论》)在当代中国哲学界具有重大的影响,在我看来原因并不只在于它批判了教科书哲学,其深层次的根源一定在于:它在哲学史的意义上完成 The real philosophical question must be in philosophical history. There is no pure “original ” that leaves the history of philosophy. Kant goes on to Hume, Hegel follows Kant and Heidegger goes on to say Hegel ... and all of these philosophers will follow Plato. Can be seen, the history of philosophy is the philosophies of different ages on the same issue of a dialogue. If the “General Theory of Philosophy” (hereinafter referred to as “general theory”) has a significant influence on the contemporary Chinese philosophical community, the reason for it in my opinion is not only that it criticizes the philosophy of textbooks, but also has its root in the deep level: In the sense of completion