从连用修饰语中最具争议的补语入手,从句法学的角度对补充成分和修饰成分的区分问题进行了探讨,并从语言逻辑的层面对补语的内涵进行了考量。明确指出:用言谓语前并不存在真正意义上的补充成分,连用修饰语中不包括补语,由‘に’‘で’‘へ’‘と’‘かろ’‘より’‘まで’等格助词所构成的限定成分(限定性状语)和由副词以及形容词、形容动词的连用形所构成的修饰成分(描述性状语)可以纳入狭义的连用修饰语范畴,统称为状语。 Starting from the most controversial complement in modifier, this paper explores the distinction between supplemental and modified components from the perspective of syntactic, and takes into account the connotation of complement from the linguistic logic level. Clearly pointed out: before the use of predicate does not exist in the real sense of the complementary components, modifiers do not include complement, from ’に’ ’で’ ’へ’ ’and’ ’か り’ ’よ ri’ ’ま で’ Constituent elements (limited adverbials) and modifier elements (descriptive adages) consisting of adverbs and adjectives and conjunctive forms of verbs may be included in narrow categories of conjunctive modifiers and are collectively referred to as adverbials.