论文部分内容阅读
利用文献计量学的方法,围绕期刊国际化的几点基本要素,即语言国际化、出版发行国际化、编委国际化,作者国际化、读者国际化,定量地对比分析了亚洲地区中、日、韩、印4国的各3种排名较前且具代表性的化学综合类期刊的国际化程度。结果表明:我国化学综合类期刊的国际化在形式上表现尚可;而在内容上与亚洲同类期刊相比,明显处于比较落后的地位。这说明我国化学类科技期刊界已经具有较强的国际化意识和办刊理念,但离办成国际一流的化学综合类期刊还有一段距离,需要充分利用形式上的国际化的优势资源,进一步从上到下的协调合作,从量到质的不懈努力来实现国际化。
By means of bibliometrics, this paper compares and analyzes some basic elements of journal internationalization, namely, internationalization of language, internationalization of publication and distribution, internationalization of Editorial Board, internationalization of authors and internationalization of readers. , South Korea, India 4 countries in each of the top three ranking and representative of the chemical synthesis of international journals. The results show that the internationalization of China’s comprehensive chemical journals can still be formalized in terms of content, while the content is obviously backward compared with similar journals in Asia. This shows that China’s chemical science and technology periodicals industry has a strong sense of internationalization and the concept of running a journal. However, there is still a long way to go before becoming a world-class chemical comprehensive journal. It is necessary to make full use of the formally international advantageous resources and further From top to bottom coordination and cooperation, from quantity to quality of unremitting efforts to achieve internationalization.