论文部分内容阅读
一、前言相信任何一个关注孙中山思想的人,对他毕生追求“民主”的决心应不会有所怀疑。然而,在所遗留的民权主义体系中,吾人发现除了“主权在民”、“全民政治”、“五权宪法”、“政党政治”、“均权与地方自治”等多项饶富民主内涵的论述外,与民主价值理念并非兼容的“训政”主张,却也在孙中山历次的阐述补充下,具体而且明确地成为其个人对国家政治制度建构的选择模式。~①孙中山此一同时蕴含“民主”与“威权”~②态样之政治蓝图主
I. Foreword I believe no one concerned about Sun Yat-sen’s thought should have any doubts about his determination to pursue “democracy” throughout his life. However, in the legacy of the system of democratism, we have found that in addition to “sovereignty over the people”, “universal politics”, “constitutional five-power”, “political party politics,” “ Autonomy ”and many other connotations of rich democratic connotation, and is not compatible with the concept of democratic values “ discipline ”advocacy, but also in Sun Yat-sen’s previous exposition complements, specifically and clearly become the individual political system of the country Construction of the choice model. ~ ① Sun Yat-sen contains both the “democracy” and “authoritarian”