论文部分内容阅读
在立法上,关于诉讼上和解的既判力,法国和日本作了肯定的规定,而德国和我国台湾地区则作了否定性规定。我国关于诉讼上和解是否具有既判力规定得不明确。在学理上,关于诉讼上和解的既判力有肯定说、否定说、限制说、部分既判力说和限缩说五种不同的观点,其中最后一种观点较有说服力。
In legislation, France and Japan have affirmed the res judicata in the settlement of the lawsuit, while Germany and Taiwan in China have made negative stipulations. Our country’s definition of the res judicata on the settlement of the lawsuit is unclear. In theory, the res judicata on the settlement of the lawsuit affirmed and said negatively, saying that the restrictions on the part of the res judicata and the restrictions on the five different points of view, of which the last one is more convincing.