论文部分内容阅读
在既往的调解协议司法审查机制中,当事人以重大误解为由要求撤销调解协议的案件屡见不鲜,人民法院的不一致裁判也时有发生。现有的调解协议诉前司法确认机制中,应保证程序安定和程序经济这双重价值之平衡,并以此为原则,判定与当事人重大误解相关的诸促成事由和阻却事由的影响力和权重,准确界定当事人“重大误解”的司法确认界限,实现案结事了,建立真正意义上的多元化纠纷解决机制。
In the judicial review mechanism of previous mediation agreements, it is not uncommon for parties to request the revocation of mediation agreements on the ground of major misunderstandings, and the inconsistent referees of the people’s court have also occurred from time to time. In the existing mediation agreement before the judicial confirmation mechanism, the balance of the dual values of procedural stability and procedural economy should be guaranteed. Based on this principle, the causes and the causes of the causes of major misunderstandings should be determined. Accurately define the parties “major misunderstanding ” of the boundaries of judicial confirmation, to achieve the end of the case, the establishment of a real sense of the diversity of dispute resolution mechanism.