论文部分内容阅读
《毛传》标兴之诗凡一一五篇,引起争议者有十九篇,文幸福作《毛公朱子兴诗辨异》一文似已注意及之。本文即研究此十九篇《毛传》标兴之表形,及其引争议之原因,并求得结论,以供学者参考。本文共分五节。第一节引言,叙述《毛传》标兴之特色,第二节讨论《毛传》赋标为兴之错误,第三节讨论《毛传》比标为兴之错误,第四节讨论《毛传》所标“兴也”二字之位置似遭后人移动,第五节结语。
“Mao Biography” Bixing poem where 115, causing controversy nineteen, Wen Haobu as “Mao Gong Zhu Zi Xing poetry discrepancies,” a text seems to have been aware of it. This article is to study the nineteen “Mao Biography” Bingsung form, and the reasons for its controversy, and draw conclusions for scholars reference. This article is divided into five sections. The first section describes the characteristics of “Mark Biography” and the second chapter discusses the error of “Mao Biography”, the third discusses the error of “Mao Biography” compared with “Xing” and the fourth chapter discusses “ Mao Biography ”standard “ Xing also ”the position of the word seems to be moved by future generations, the fifth epilogue.