Evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery: a systema

来源 :第二十届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会、第二届中国医师协会中西医结合医师分会骨伤科学术年会、第十九届浙江省中西医结合骨伤 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:xingsen777
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Objective To identify the independent risk factors for the patients with surgical site infections (SSI) after spinal surgery based on available evidence in the literature.Background.Surgical site infections (SSI) lead to higher morbidity, mortality and increased healthcare costs.Various risk factors influence the postoperative infections.Disclosure which factors lead to an increased risk of SSI is of importance for the development of prophylactic protocols to counter this risk.However, these factors have neither been well synthesized or summarised according to methodological quality of studies evaluating risk factors for SSI.Methods Non-interventional studies evaluating the independent risk factors for the patients with SSI following spinal surgery were searched in Medline, Embase, Sciencedirect and OVID.Quality of included studies were assessed by a modified quality assessment tool, which was previously designed for observational study.The effects of studies were combined with the study quality score using a model of best-evidence synthesis.Results 35 observational studies involving 24, 774 subjects were identified.Included studies covered a wide range of indications and surgical procedures.These articles published between 1998 to 2012.According to the quality assessment criteria for included studies, 14 studies were deemed as high quality studies, 5 as moderate quality studies, and 16 as low quality studies.A total of 46 different type of independent factors were evaluated for the risk of SSI.There were strong evidence for 6 factors, including obesity/BMI, longer operation time, diabetes, smoking, history of previous SSI and type of surgery procedure.We also identified 8 moderate evidence, 31 limited evidence and one conflicting evidence factors.Conclusion Whilst there is no conclusive evidence for the postoperative SSI, these data provide evidence to guide the clinician to admit patients who will have spinal operation and to choice a optimal prophylactic strategy.Further researches were still required to evaluate the effects of these above factors.
其他文献
目的 回顾性的研究和比较经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)和经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)的临床疗效及不同压缩程度下对脊柱后凸角的纠正,为不同压缩程度下最佳术式的选择提供依据.方法 总结2004-2010年在我院行单节段PVP或PKP术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折(osteoporotic vertebral
会议
会议
目的 探讨胸腰椎骨折采取经皮椎弓根螺钉技术治疗中,同时运用手法复位治疗的临床效果.方法 选择我院2010年1月至2013年1月收治的胸腰椎骨折应用经皮椎弓根螺钉技术治疗患者25例,10例患者单纯采用经皮椎弓根螺钉技术治疗,15例患者术中配合采用手法复位方法进行治疗,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果 对本组患者行半年~3年的随访,以复位前后Cobb角、椎体前缘平均高度及脊柱生理弧度、有无术中神经、脊
目的 评估颈前路人工椎间盘置换术(Anterior artificial disc insertion,AADI)和颈前路椎间减压融合术(Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion,ACDF)两种不同术式对术后早期吞咽功能的影响。方法 比较98例接受单节段和双节段AADI或ACDF患者的资料。对比不同术式对患者手术时间、出血量及术后各随访时间点吞咽困难发生率、吞
目的 比较经皮及开放单节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗不完全胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者的安全性和有效性.方法 回顾分析2009年3月至2011年1月脊柱胸腰段不完全爆裂骨折行单节段固定共44例,其中开放组20例,经皮组24例.比较两组患者手术时间、出血量、术后引流量、术前术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和伤椎后凸角等.结果 两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术中出血量差异有统计学意义[(20±10)
目的 分析单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效.方法 本研究包括123例骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折患者,其中男42例,女81例;年龄63~81岁,平均72岁.所有手术均在局麻下经单侧椎弓根入路行球囊后凸成形术.骨折椎体:T64例;T7 3例;T87例;T93例;T10 12例;T11 16例,T12 27例,L1
会议
会议
目的 探讨脊柱关节炎误诊导致腰椎手术失败综合征的原因及处理对策.方法 2005年4月至2012年4月,因椎间盘突出症伴或不伴椎管狭窄接受腰椎椎板减压、髓核摘除和(或)内固定手术,术后发生手术失败综合征而再次入院者18例,其中10例患者再次入院主诉症状一致,即腰背痛与术前相同,表现为夜间痛明显,无法长时间保持一个姿势,活动后症状有所减轻.10例中男3例,女7例;年龄37-81岁,平均58.6岁.再次
会议
目的 通过分析国内外相关文献,评价伤椎置钉短节段内固定和传统短节段内固定的临床疗效。方法 计算机检索1990年1月至2012年12月,中国知网数据库、Pubmed、Cochrane系统评价资料库、Cochrane临床对照试验中心数据库等中英文数据库,并同时采用手工检索,按照既定的纳入和排除标准查找伤椎置钉短节段内固定和传统内固定比较的相关文献。对纳入的文章进行质量评价,并进行Meta分析。结果 共
会议
目的 回顾分析腰椎间盘突出症被误诊为腰椎椎管内肿瘤的原因,探讨其鉴别要点.方法 回顾分析2003年1月至2012年1月我院共收治的18例以腰椎椎管内占位诊断入院最后确诊为腰椎间盘突出症患者的发病特点、病程、体格检查、影像学特别是强化MRI的特征,分析发生误诊的原因.归纳出两类疾病的各自特征及鉴别要点和方法.结果 大部分腰椎间盘突出症患者根据临床表现及影像学检查能够很容易诊断,但部分游离性腰椎间盘突
会议