论文部分内容阅读
“老子學”研究在二十世紀初期,呈現許多方法論的新開展。除傳統評點以訓詁考據或義理著眼,也參入西方哲學式的詮解,晚清以降的佛學思潮同樣影響詮釋1。當中“援佛入老,以佛解老”除展現佛學爲本,印證佛老義理不二,何以會通,如何安頓佛老關係的定位?咸值得關注。此未符道家學説本旨的闡釋意圖,反開啟《老子》交融其他學術的新路數,表露時代特質與詮釋者學術涵養。馬一浮(1883—1967),名浮,字一浮,號湛翁,别署蠲叟、蠲戲老人,爲現代新儒家
“Laozi learn ” research in the early twentieth century, showing many new methodological development. In addition to the traditional commentaries on the basis of exegetical examination or justification, but also into the Western philosophical interpretation, the Buddhist thought of late Qing dynasty also affect the interpretation of 1. Among them, “aid the Buddha into the old and solve the old Buddha” can not only demonstrate the Buddha-based theory, but also prove why the Buddha is old and not justified. How to settle the positioning of Buddha-Laos relationship? This is not in line with the intention of Taoism to explain its intention and to open up a new road to the integration of other scholarship by Lao Tzu, revealing the academic qualities of the times and the interpreters. Ma Yi floating (1883-1967), the name floating, the word floating, number Zhan Weng, Department of Xuyi, Nuo play the elderly, as a modern Neo-Confucianism