论文部分内容阅读
人们关于社会正义的认识是多元的,这要求居间作出的司法判决应当经得起理性论证的检验,以防范法官选择正义立场时的任意。经得起理性检验的判决又必须借助修辞方法的使用,才能使其为判决不利方接受。在社会正义的司法实现过程中,修辞具有重要的方法论作用,但它必须在法律论证框架下使用,才符合其秉承善意而加以应用的本质。
People’s understanding of social justice is diverse, which requires intervening judicial decisions should withstand the test of rational argument in order to prevent judges from arbitrarily choosing the just position. The judgments that can withstand the test of rationality must be supported by rhetorical methods so that they can not be accepted by the verdict. Rhetoric plays an important methodological role in the process of judicial realization of social justice, but it must be used under the framework of legal argumentation in order to meet the essence of its application in good faith.