论文部分内容阅读
科技期刊既不能界定为完全的私人品,也不能界定为纯公益性的公共品。所以,除了公益性和经营性两种模式,还存在准公益性的模式。对于那些学术水平高,但通过自身实现的经济效益不能维持或仅够维持生存的科技期刊,应划分为准公益性,一方面政府财政部分支持,一方面也要让其参与竞争。在条件成熟的时候,让其自我发展,实现企业化经营。对于划分为准公益性模式的科技期刊应进行定期考核,有衡量优劣的标准,通过制度性手段,督促其不断发展、提高。
Sci-tech periodicals can neither be defined as completely private goods, nor can they be defined as pure public goods. Therefore, in addition to the two modes of public welfare and business, there is a quasi-public welfare model. For those sci-tech periodicals which are of academic level but can not be maintained or survived only through their own economic benefits, they shall be classified as quasi-public welfare projects. On the one hand, they should be supported by government financial departments and, on the other hand, they must be allowed to participate in the competition. When the conditions are ripe, let them self-development, business management. Sci-tech journals classified as quasi-public welfare should be subject to regular assessment, with a measure of superiority and inferiority, and through institutional means, urge them to continuously develop and improve.