论文部分内容阅读
近年来,在一些案件中,尤其是备受关注的刑事案件中,时有出现涉案者上电视进行认错或者认罪的情况。随着人们思想观念的不断多元化,这种做法也引发了诸多争议。支持者认为,让犯错者上电视认错乃至认罪,这不仅可以满足公众的知情权,回应群众关切,另一方面也可以展现司法机关打击违法犯罪的力度,提升群众安全感,更能对潜在不端者起到震慑作用。而反对者则认为,让犯错者公然认罪是侵犯人权的行为,甚至是一种法外耻辱刑,特别是对于刑事未决案而言,更可能侵害到犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼权利,让裁判者先入为主,沦为“舆论审判”。
In recent years, in some cases, especially in the criminal cases that have drawn much attention, there have been occasions when the involved persons make mistakes or confess their crimes on television. With the continuous diversification of people’s ideas and ideas, this practice has caused many controversies. Proponents argue that allowing those who make mistakes to admit or even guilty of crimes on television not only meets the public’s right to information, responds to the concerns of the masses, but also shows the judiciary’s efforts to crack down on crimes and enhance the sense of security among the public. End play a deterrent effect. Opponents argue that it is a violation of human rights and even a form of extrajudicial humiliation to convict a person who makes the mistake, especially for a criminal case that is more likely to infringe upon the criminal suspect’s right of action and allow the judge Preconceived, reduced to “public opinion trial ”.