虽然制度层面上我国法官的法律解释空间非常狭窄,但是法律解释的客观性以及司法克制决定了法官理论层面上应当拥有适度的法律解释空间。在司法实践中,法官在主客观因素影响下经常进行法律解释,并运用一定的方法和技巧实现法律解释空间的扩张。 Although there is a very narrow legal interpretation space for our judges at the institutional level, the objectivity of legal interpretation and judicial restraint determine that there should be ample room for legal interpretation on the theoretical level of judges. In judicial practice, judges often make legal explanations under the influence of the subjective and objective factors, and use certain methods and techniques to achieve the expansion of legal interpretation space.