论文部分内容阅读
顾颉刚治史思想的根基源于中国本土的考据之学,而从西方传入的实证主义史学方法则使得其史学思想与前人相比有了质的飞跃,大胆地对古史进行辨伪与考证,并将自己的理论公之于众,与学者进行讨论。然而,通过破坏来“辨史”只是其手段,真正的目的是建设符合新时代的历史观。但由于顾氏对于考古学成果的抛弃、对史料的主观使用以及过度地用神话故事来论证古史等因素,使得顾颉刚渐渐脱离了实证主义史学的路线。
The foundation of Gu Jie-gang’s thought on the history was originated from the study of the Chinese native, while the positivist historiography method introduced from the west made its historical thought make a qualitative leap compared with his predecessors. Textual research, and make their own theory public, discuss with scholars. However, by disrupting “history ” is only its means, the real purpose is to build a historical view that is in keeping with the new era. However, Gu’s abandonment of archaeological achievements, the subjective use of historical materials and the excessive use of myths to prove the history and other factors made Gu Jiegang gradually depart from the line of positivist historiography.