论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较不同明度和不同饱和度D-15试验的临床应用价值。方法:应用Panel D-15试验、Hann氏双D-15试验和北京中国科学院心理研究所中、低饱和度D-15试验[简称CAS-PI D-15试验]对18例(30眼)正常人、19例(38眼)先天性色觉异常、36例(59眼)眼病患者(包括黄斑病、视神经病变、Graves眼病)进行检测。结果:在正常人中,少部分受试眼在低饱和度D-15试验出现小错;在先天性色觉异常者中,五套试验皆能正确检出红色盲和绿色盲者,红色弱和绿色弱者则可出现各种改变;在眼病患者中,两套低饱和度D-15试验的异常率最高,Panel D-15异常率最低。结论:5套不同明度和不同饱和度D-15试验在先天性色觉异常者的检出率大致相同,在眼病患者中,中科院心理所研制的CAS-PI(4/5)D-15试验和CAS-PI(2/5)D-15试验与国外同类试验的检出率大致相同,可以在临床应用。眼科学报2000;16:84-86。
Objective: To compare the clinical value of different lightness and different saturation D-15 test. Methods: Eighteen patients (30 eyes) underwent normal operation with Panel D-15 test, Hann’s double D-15 test and the moderate to low saturation D-15 test [CAS-PI D-15 test] of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. Nineteen patients (38 eyes) had congenital color vision abnormalities and 36 patients (59 eyes) with ocular diseases (including maculopathies, optic neuropathy and Graves ophthalmopathy) were examined. Results: In the normal subjects, a small part of the test eyes showed a slight mistake in the low saturation D-15 test. Among the congenital abnormalities of color vision, all five tests could correctly detect the red-blind and the green-blind, the red weak and the green In the weaker, various changes may occur; among the patients with ocular diseases, the abnormal rate of the two sets of low saturation D-15 test is the highest, and the Panel D-15 abnormal rate is the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: The detection rates of 5 D-15s with different lightness and saturation are almost the same in patients with congenital abnormal color vision. Among CAS patients, CAS-PI (4/5) D-15 test CAS-PI (2/5) D-15 test and similar tests abroad similar to the same rate, you can in clinical applications. Journal of Ophthalmology 2000; 16: 84-86.