论文部分内容阅读
关于劳动价值论的“新解释”自提出以来,各种争论绵延至今。我们面临着如何准确认识和理解劳动价值论的“新解释”的问题,同时也面临着如何正确发展与创新马克思劳动价值论的问题。按照马克思的货币的价值与交换价值的理论与论述,“新解释”学派的定义与理论基础无疑与马克思的定义与理论基础有着本质的区别与差异。在价格层面上进行实证研究的“新解释”学派的研究方法,与极力否定劳动价值论的西方主流经济学一贯的研究方法并无根本的区别与差异。
With regard to the “new explanation” of labor theory of value, disputes have been going on ever since their introduction. We face the problem of how to accurately understand and understand the “new interpretation” of labor theory of value and how to correctly develop and innovate Marx’s labor theory of value. According to the theory and exposition of the value and exchange value of Marx’s money, the definition and theoretical foundation of the “new explanation ” school are undoubtedly different from those of Marx’s definition and theory fundamentally. There is no fundamental difference or difference between the research method of “new explanation” and the method of empirical research at the price level that is consistent with western mainstream economics, which strongly negates the labor theory of value.