论文部分内容阅读
领导指导类是按问题分类时才产生的,张步云、夏里同志的文章都明确的提出了这个问题。这一点很重要,离开这个来谈论领导指导类的必要、领导指导类的优越性以及领导指导类的范围,不但是多余的,而且会引起麻烦。在实际工作中,有的同志常常自觉或不自觉的把组织机构的分类原则与问题分类原则硬拉在一起,例如,从本年第三期“档案工作”登载的海真同志的文章看,他们是采用组织机构的分类原则的,但在每一类的前面还都设有××工作的领导指导项(这里并不需要写××工作,因为按组织机构分类了,就已经规定了它的范围),由於一个机构内文件数量的关系,领导指导项就成为不必要的了。
Leadership guidance class is generated by the problem classification, Zhang Buyun, comrade Xia Li articles have clearly put forward this issue. It is important to leave this to talk about the need for leadership classes, the superiority of leadership classes, and the range of leadership classes that are both unnecessary and troublesome. In actual work, some comrades often conscientiously or unconsciously pull together the classification principles of organization and the principle of classification of problems. For example, judging from the article published by the “Archives Work” published in the third file of this year, They adopted the principle of the classification of organizations, but in front of each category there are also leadership instructions for the work of XX (there is no need to write XX work because it is already defined by the organization ), Because of the number of documents within an agency, the leadership indicator becomes unnecessary.