论文部分内容阅读
事实解释,是指将生活事项予以陈述、剪除、评价,以及推动事实与规范的流转往返。本文以对个案的参与式考察和多维度解读为主线,通过发掘自生自发秩序,提炼出事实解释的三大规则。首先透过常识的规则化潜质,引出事实解释的前置性假说—有限事实规则。随后通过对事实解释三大模型的利弊剖析,推演出事实解释的功能性选择—依过错分配不利事实解释规则。最后开示了事实解释的统领式方略—优越利益保护规则。
Factual interpretation refers to the life events to be stated, cut off, evaluation, and to promote the circulation of facts and norms. This article, taking the case-based investigation and multi-dimensional interpretation as the main line, explores the three rules of factual interpretation by exploring the spontaneous order. First of all, through the regularized potential of common sense, it leads to the premise hypothesis of factual interpretation - the rule of limited fact. Then by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the three models, we deduce the functional choice of factual interpretation - according to the wrong distribution of adverse facts to explain the rules. Finally, it reveals the common-sense strategy of factual interpretation - the rules of superior interests protection.