论文部分内容阅读
目的对比两种胃管插入长度的比量方法对洗胃效果的影响。方法把药物或毒物中毒的患者随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组采用传统的从胃管尾端位置开始比量发际至剑突的方法,长度为45~55 cm;观察组采用从胃管第三侧孔位置开始比量发际至剑突的方法,长度为45~55 cm+12 cm(胃管顶孔到第三侧孔的距离)。结果在洗胃不彻底和粘膜破损的发生例数上,观察组低于对照组,观察组与对照组的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与采用传统的从胃管尾端位置开始比量发际至剑突的方法相比,采用从胃管第三侧孔位置开始比量发际至剑突的方法进行胃管插入时洗胃的效果更好。
Objective To compare the effects of two methods of gastric tube insertion length on gastric lavage. Methods Patients with poisoning or poisoning were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group using the traditional method from the end of the stomach tube volume hairline to the xiphoid method, the length of 45 ~ 55 cm; observation group used from the third side of the tube position than the amount of hairline to the process of kyphosis , The length of 45 ~ 55 cm +12 cm (the distance from the top of the stomach tube to the third side hole). Results In the case of incomplete gastric lavage and mucosal damage, the observation group was lower than the control group, the difference between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional method of measuring the amount of hairline from the hairline to the xiphoid process from the tail end of gastric tube, gastric lavage The effect is better.