论文部分内容阅读
我国现行的引渡司法审查程序存在司法化特征不明显,检察机关职能定位不清晰、职权不明,引渡诉讼缺乏控告方的参与等问题。可借鉴域外引渡司法审查制度与实践,进一步明晰我国检察机关在被动引渡中的职能,优化诉讼职权配置,建立符合国际惯例和我国诉讼制度特点的引渡司法审查程序。我国检察机关要在境外追逃追赃中发挥主渠道作用,应当提高向外国司法机关提供刑事协助与合作的能力,并在制度和实践中确立和巩固相关的职能与地位。
The current judicial review procedure of extradition in our country is not obvious, the function orientation of procuratorial organs is not clear, the authority is unknown, and the prosecutors’ participation in the extradition proceedings lacks. We can draw lessons from the extradition extradition judicial review system and practice, further clarify the function of procuratorial organs in passive extradition, optimize the allocation of litigation powers and establish procedures for extradition judicial review in line with international practice and the features of China’s litigation system. The procuratorial organs in our country should play the main role of channeling and pursuing stolen goods abroad. They should increase their ability to provide criminal assistance and cooperation to foreign judicial organs and establish and consolidate the relevant functions and positions in the system and in practice.