本文主要考查目前关于心理机制模组性的三种方法,即福多的“经典模组性”、科拉索斯的“大规模模组性”以及西格尔的“适度模组性”观点。自福多提出输入系统是模组性、中央系统是非模组性的观点之后,该观点一直处于争议之中。通过分析可以发现,尽管当前对“经典模组性”的观点仍存在争议,但从最简原则出发,它目前仍是对心灵机制的最佳解释理论之一。 This paper mainly examines the current three methods on the psychological mechanism of modularity, that is, Fido’s “classic modularity”, Corrasos’s “large-scale modularity” and Siegel’s “moderation Modularity ”point of view. Since the Fudo proposed input system is modular, the central system is a non-modular point of view, this view has been in dispute. Through analysis, we can find that although the current view of “classical modularity ” is still controversial, starting from the simplest principle, it is still one of the best explanation theories about the mechanism of mind.