尽管中国的“文艺学”因其是前苏联的舶来品且与西方文论缺乏学科意义上的对应性而一直属于受质疑的对象,但是,从实际操作层面上讲,中国的“文艺学”又因其对所有有关文学的理论研究的巨大包容性,使得我们在进行中西文论对话比较时又在具有相当大的灵活性——在文论话语的对话交流和理论对接上,中国学者并没有多少因“名不正言不顺”而带来的表述困境,相反,在各取 Although China ’s “literature and art ” has always been a subject of challenge because it is a foreign product of the former Soviet Union and lacks the correspondence in the academic sense with western literary theory. However, in practical terms, Because of its great inclusiveness in the theoretical research of all the related literatures, we have considerable flexibility in dialogue and comparison between Chinese and Western literary works - in dialogues and theoretical docking of literary discourse, Chinese scholars do not have much representation of the predicament caused by the “name is not correct”, on the contrary,