论文部分内容阅读
本文试图对关于语词之争这样的元哲学问题加以探讨,并指出可能的解决途径。在相当多的哲学争论中,有很多争论只是琐屑的语词之争,那么如何区别语词之争和真正的事实之争呢?我们可以通过语词测试来加以检验,从而辨别出何谓语词之争何谓事实之争,一旦某论题为事实之争,则在语言层面上的争论就变成了关于基底概念的讨论,比如关于意识问题,伦理学问题等等。在关于这样的基本概念上,无法给出唯一的定义,我们需要运用概念多元主义,不同的概念承担着不同的功能,因此本文所提供的方法并不能彻底地解决争议,而是有助于我们接近问题的核心,重新题解问题本身。
This article attempts to discuss the meta-philosophical questions about the wars between words and points out the possible solutions. In a considerable number of philosophical arguments, there are many controversies that are trivial wars, how to distinguish between the wording of the words and the real ones? We can test it by means of word tests to distinguish what is meant by the wording of the wording If a topic is a matter of fact, then the debate on the linguistic level becomes a discussion of the concept of the base, such as the issues of consciousness, ethics and so on. In this basic concept, we can not give a unique definition, we need to use conceptual pluralism, different concepts assume different functions, so the method provided in this article does not completely solve the dispute, but to help us Approach the core of the problem and reinterpret the problem itself.