论文部分内容阅读
通过对《蚌埠医学院学报》2009年刊发论文中的484篇原始稿件的调查,了解医学稿件中统计学分析使用及其使用错误情况。结果显示:统计学分析使用率为49.38%,基础类、临床类和护理类稿件的使用率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),基础类稿件统计学分析使用错误率低于临床类稿件(P<0.01),第一作者为硕士及以上学历与本科及以下学历的统计学分析使用错误差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。医学稿件中统计学分析使用率不太高,但使用的错误率较高;较高学历作者统计学分析使用情况不容乐观。通过层层把关,提高《蚌埠医学院学报》刊出论文的统计学分析质量。
Through the survey of 484 original manuscripts published in the 2009 Bengbu Medical College journal, we can understand the use of statistical analysis in medical manuscripts and their usage errors. The results showed that the rate of using statistical analysis was 49.38%, the usage rates of basic, clinical and nursing manuscripts were all statistically significant (P <0.01), and the error rates of basic manuscript statistical analysis were lower than those of clinical manuscripts (P <0.01). There was no significant difference in using errors between the first author who had a master ’s degree or above and the undergraduate degree or below (P> 0.05). Medical manuscripts in the statistical analysis of the use of rate is not high, but the use of a higher error rate; statistical analysis of higher academic use of the situation is not optimistic. Through Cengcengbaguan to improve “Bengbu Medical College Journal” published statistical analysis of the quality of the paper.