论文部分内容阅读
从阅读《法学方法论》中产生的关于法律解释标准顺位的疑惑开始,继而对德国争论已久的主客观说予以探究。主观说主张以探究历史上立法者的心理意愿为解释目标,客观说则主张以解析法律内存的意义为目标,两派别都有充分的理由从多个角度予以证成。为加深对问题的认知,需要从法政治学、法哲学以及社会科学三个不同的维度对问题进行解读。
Beginning with the reading of the doubts about the order of legal interpretations produced in Legal Methodology, the subject of objectivity and objectivity that Germany has long debated has been explored. The subjective theory advocates exploring the psychological intention of legislators in history as the objective of explanation, and objectively advocates the objective of analyzing the meaning of legal memory. Both parties have sufficient reasons to prove it from many angles. In order to deepen the cognition of the question, we need to interpret the question from three different dimensions, namely, law and political science, legal philosophy and social science.