论文部分内容阅读
元明清时期,西藏地区在中华法制的框架内保持相对自治的地位,因此其地方法制呈现出独特性。自元末时期的帕竹政权开始,西藏地方政府将西藏法制法典化,赔命价成为西藏法典的一个条款。法典化的赔命价继承了吐蕃时期按照人的社会等级划分命价的做法,是西藏社会结构在法律上的体现。法典化的赔命价具备制定法的形式理性。实体性的赔命价规则是西藏地方司法处理命案纠纷的依据;同时,西藏地方法典还规定了程序性的命价赔付规则,以约束司法官吏。法典化的赔命价是藏区法律文化中最具特色的制度,是当代藏区民间集体记忆的寄托对象。
During the Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties, Tibet maintained a relatively autonomous status within the framework of the Chinese legal system, and therefore its local legal system showed its uniqueness. Since the end of the Pajuchu regime in late Yuan Dynasty, the Tibetan local government has codified the legal system of Tibet and made the compensation for the cost of life a clause in the Tibetan code. The codification of the compensatory life-value inherits the pricing method of the Tubo period according to the social class of the people, which is the legal embodiment of the social structure in Tibet. Codification of the compensatory price has the formal rationality of the statute. The substantive law of compensation for the cost of life is the basis for the judicial processing of the murder case in Tibet. At the same time, the Tibet Local Code also stipulates the procedural rules for the payment of the price in order to restrain the judicial officials. The cost of codification is the most distinctive system in the legal culture of Tibetan areas and is the object of mass collective memory in contemporary Tibetan areas.