论文部分内容阅读
在主观上,行为人的学术违规行为可以被分为“有意”或“非有意”违反规定的行为,前者被认定为学术不端行为,后者被视为不需要担责的诚实性行为。除重大过失之外,行为人不因一般过失而承担责任。在提出责任方式宏观结构和微观构成标准的基础上,探讨同类或不同类别责任方式的替代问题以及不同责任方式的相同或相似效果问题,构建学术不端行为责任方式的逻辑体系,确立数种责任方式并用及其先后使用的规则。
Subjectively, the perpetrator’s academic irregularities can be divided into “intentional” or “non-intentional” violations, the former being considered as academic misconduct and the latter being deemed not to be held responsible Honesty. Except for gross negligence, the perpetrator is not liable for ordinary negligence. Based on the macrostructures and microscopic composition standards of responsibility modes, this article discusses the substitution problems of the same or different types of responsibility modes and the same or similar effects of different responsibility modes, constructs the logical system of academic misconduct responsibility modes and establishes several kinds of responsibilities Ways and their use has followed the rules.