论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨介入联合中医药治疗盆腔淤血综合征的临床效果及可行性。方法:根据不同方法对16例确诊盆腔淤血综合征的患者随机分成两组,各组8例,研究组行介入治疗后加用中药治疗,对照组单纯用中药治疗,中药均为3个疗程。盆腔淤血征程度、发病年龄两组间差异无统计学意义。统计治疗结果及复发率等情况,并将两组进行对照比较。结果:两组在治愈率、好转率、未愈率及复发率比较中,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组:介入+中药治疗治愈率较对照组高,未愈率及复发率均较对照组低。结论:两组治疗方式中以经卵巢静脉栓塞后加用中药治疗初始疗效肯定,远期效果好,复发率低,是目前较好的治疗手段。对照组纯中药治疗费用低廉,不良反应少,治疗方便,但存在疗程长,易复发等弊端。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect and feasibility of interventional Chinese medicine in treating pelvic congestion syndrome. Methods: According to different methods, 16 patients with pelvic congestion syndrome were randomly divided into two groups, 8 in each group. The study group was treated with traditional Chinese medicine after interventional therapy. The control group was treated with traditional Chinese medicine only. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the degree of pelvic congestion and the age of onset. Statistical treatment results and recurrence rate and other conditions, and the two groups were compared. Results: There was significant difference between the two groups in cure rate, improvement rate, unhealed rate and recurrence rate (P <0.05). Study Group: Intervention + Chinese medicine cure rate was higher than the control group, unhealed rate and recurrence rate were lower than the control group. Conclusion: The two groups of treatment methods to ovarian vein embolization plus traditional Chinese medicine treatment for the initial effect of positive long-term effect, low recurrence rate is the better treatment. The control group of pure Chinese medicine treatment costs low, fewer adverse reactions, the treatment is convenient, but there are long course of treatment, easy to relapse and other drawbacks.