论文部分内容阅读
北海工商行国际部上诉称:(一)原审认定湛江船代没有凭正本提单放货与事实不符。事实上,我方已出示了大量人证,证明西安工商行国际部在陕西公司表示对远期信用证承兑后,即将全套正本提单交付给陕西公司,并且陕西公司亦即派员携全套正本提单到湛江要求提货,湛江船代是在看过提单后才予以放货的。进一步讲,我方出示的保函从未被船东接收,收货人是在出示了正本提单的情况下才提取货物,而非凭保函。因此,我
International Department of Beihai Industrial and Commercial Bank appealed: (A) the original trial found Zhanjiang Shipments not delivered with the original bill of lading factual discrepancies. In fact, we have produced a large number of people to prove that the International Department of Xi’an Industrial and Commercial Bank in Shaanxi Province, said the long-term credit acceptance, the full set of original bills of lading will be delivered to the company in Shaanxi, and Shaanxi companies that is sent to bring a full set of original bills of lading To Zhanjiang request delivery, Zhanjiang shipping agency is to read the bill of lading before being released. Further, the guarantee letter we have presented is never accepted by the shipowner, and the consignee will only pick up the goods instead of the letter of guarantee with the original bill of lading. so I