论文部分内容阅读
香港基本法的解释机制不宜概括为双轨制或二元制,因为根据《基本法》第158条有关解释权的配置关系和逻辑结构,基本法解释权属于全国人大常委会,香港法院获得的解释权只能是来自全国人大常委会的授权。香港法院因授权获得的解释权不能与全国人大常委会固有的解释权相提并论,因为两者的权力性质不同、权力关系不同、地位效力不同、解释权的启动不同。把香港基本法解释机制概括为“一元双重解释制”或“一元两极主从解释制”较为合适。
The interpretation mechanism of the Hong Kong Basic Law should not be summed up as a two-track system or a dual system. According to Article 158 of the Basic Law regarding the configuration and logical structure of the power of interpretation, the power of interpretation of the Basic Law belongs to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. The power of interpretation of a Hong Kong court can only From the NPC Standing Committee’s mandate. The power of interpretation given by Hong Kong courts for delegation of authority can not be compared with the inherent power of interpretation of the NPC Standing Committee. They differ in the nature of power, power relations, status and effectiveness, and power of interpretation. It is more appropriate to generalize the mechanism of Hong Kong’s interpretation of the basic law as “one-dollar dual explanation system” or “one-element bipolarism-interpretation system.”