我认为,在讨论中应把三论本身与三论在中国的研究和应用这两方面加以区分,分别加以考察和评价。比如一支新枪是科学的实用的,而你打不准靶子,或使用不当出了点问题,就把责任归罪于枪本身,这不是公平的态度。首先,三论本身是不是一种科学?我想这是无庸置疑的。系统论、信息论、控制论是二十世纪自然科学四大最新成就之一,是现代科学发展的必然产物。在进入“系统社会”的今天,它们将发挥着越来越大的作用。至于说“就系统论而言那是已包含在辨证唯物论之中的”,我以为此观点抹煞了系统论这门科学的独立存在,仍然把哲学视为包罗万象的、凌驾在科学头上的“总汇”,是有失偏颇的。其次,如何评价我国学术界对三论的研究和应 In my opinion, we should make a distinction between the three theories themselves and the research and application of the three theories in China in the discussion, and examine and appraise them respectively. For example, if a new gun is scientific and practical, you may blame the blame on the gun if you do not punctually target it or if you use it improperly. This is not an equitable attitude. First of all, is not it true that the three theories are themselves a science? I think this is beyond doubt. System theory, information theory and cybernetics are one of the four most recent achievements of the natural sciences in the twentieth century and are the inevitable outcome of the development of modern science. Today, entering the “system society”, they will play an increasingly important role. As for saying that “it is already included in the dialectical materialism in terms of system theory,” I think this view has denied the independent existence of the science of systemism and still regards philosophy as an all-encompassing one above science “Confluence” is biased. Secondly, how to evaluate the research and application of the three theories in our country's academia