在许多论战性的文章里,特别是在毛主席的著作和《人民日报》的社论、评论里,常常采用一种富有逻辑力量的反驳方法——归谬法。前美国助理国务卿帕森斯,硬把新中国的强大作为美国所以要敌视中国、侵略中国和威胁中国的理由。他说,中国已经成为强大的力量,而中国周围的“自由国家”是虚弱的,因此美国的首要任务是要帮助这些国家生存下去,以维持远东地区的“均势”。1960年3月4日人民日报发表的题为《帕森斯的死胡同》一文反驳这种强盗逻辑说: 试问,如果美国的所谓“均势”论可以成立的话,那么,美国周围的国家同美国比较起来,也是弱小的,因此任何一个亚洲国家或欧洲国家岂不是也可以以此为理由,派遣舰队到美国海岸去挑衅,占领美国的领土,在美国周围建立军事基地,把美 In many controversial articles, especially in Chairman Mao’s book and in the editorials and commentary of the People’s Daily, a logic-rich rebuttal method, the fallacy of returning, is often adopted. Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Parsons hard on the new China as the United States so hostile to China, invading China and threaten China. He said that China has become a mighty force and the “free countries” around China are weak. Therefore, the primary mission of the United States is to help these countries survive and maintain the “balance of power” in the Far East. On March 4, 1960, the People’s Daily published a paper entitled “Dead End of Parsons,” arguing against the logic of banditry: “If the so-called” balance of power "theory in the United States can be established, then the countries around the United States will be compared with the United States Therefore, it is also possible for any Asian country or European country to use this as a reason to send a fleet to provoke the coast of the United States, occupy the territory of the United States, establish a military base around the United States,