论文部分内容阅读
针对马恒通先生有关图书馆学研究对象的分析、评判及其“馆藏知识的传播”问题提出不同看法,认为学科“研究对象”很难用一个为大家普遍认同、一致的“标准”固定不变:“研究对象”之争,源于主体在观照事物时存在宏观与微观的不同视角,可以继续探索与争鸣:“馆藏知识传播论”并未准确地揭示图书馆活动的本质,也不是图书馆学研究对象的终结。
In view of Mr. Ma Hengtong’s analysis, judgment and the issue of “the spread of collection knowledge” of library science, we think that it is very difficult for the subject “subject of study ’to be universally accepted and consistent Standard ”Fixed: “ The object of the controversy, ”stems from the subject in the perspective of things there are macro and micro perspectives, you can continue to explore and contend: “ Collection Knowledge Transmission Theory ”did not accurately reveal The essence of library activities, nor the end of the study of library science.