论文部分内容阅读
近年来,我国工业快速发展,相比之下,农业则相对滞后,改革已成必行之势。本文从集体地权制度所存在的诸多弊端切入,通过比较、分析理论界关于集体地权制度重构的三种模式之利弊,提出复合式改革模式,以期重构我国农村地权制度。该种制度模式在宏观上将集体土地收归国有,使国家所有权流于形式化,在实际法律制度的构建上要尽可能赋予农民最大的自主权,此种用益物权应该相当于所有权,并给予物权保护的强度,让集体组织淡出。
In recent years, the rapid development of China’s industry, in contrast, agriculture is relatively backward, the reform has become a must. This article analyzes the pros and cons of the three modes of collective land ownership system reform by comparing and analyzing the many drawbacks existing in the collective land ownership system and proposes a composite reform model in order to reconstruct the rural land ownership system in China. This kind of institutional mode, which macroscopically reverts collective land to state ownership, formalizes state ownership, maximizes peasants’ maximum autonomy in the construction of the actual legal system, and such usufructuary rights should be equal to ownership Give the intensity of property protection, so that collective organizations fade out.