论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】原告基于旧规章的规定参加养老保险,并履行了旧规章规定的缴费义务,然而在其达到退休年龄时规章发生了新旧更迭,被告适用新规章的规定计发原告的养老保险待遇,致使原告并未获得缴费时预期的可得利益。在此情形下如何选择适用法律规范,相关立法并无明文规定。劳动行政部门以原告的退休日期作为选择适用法律的时点依据,从新适用法律,忽略了具体行政行为的特殊性质、信赖利益保护的行政法理等因素,被法院判决撤销,并责令重作具体行政行为。
The purpose of the referee The plaintiff based on the old rules and regulations to participate in old-age insurance, and fulfill the obligations of the old rules of contribution, but when it reached the retirement age, the rules of the old and new changes occurred, the defendant apply the new rules require the payment of the pension insurance , Resulting in the claimant did not receive the expected benefits of payment. In this case, how to choose the applicable legal norms, the relevant legislation does not expressly provide. The labor administration department takes the date of the plaintiff’s retirement as the basis for choosing the applicable law, re-applying the law, neglecting the special nature of the specific administrative act and the administrative jurisprudence relying on the protection of interests, etc., being revoked by the court’s decision and ordered to redo the specific administrative behavior.