论文部分内容阅读
伴随着投资的多元化,向公司进行隐名出资的现象在实践中广泛存在。但是我国当前的法律制度和司法实践却相对滞后。如何构建出符合法理并且适应我国法律体系的理论框架,用来界定隐名出资法律关系,这一对隐名出资纠纷起着重要作用的一环,就成了亟待解决的问题。本文在现有裁判文书的实证分析基础上,对学界主流的委托代理与信托机制进行对比梳理,提出了解决的可行路径以及相关的完善建议。
With the diversification of investment, the phenomenon of making an anonymous investment in a company is widespread in practice. However, the current legal system and judicial practice in our country are relatively lagging behind. How to construct a theoretical framework which accords with jurisprudence and adapt to our country’s legal system is to define the legal relationship of anonymous financing, which has become an urgent problem to be solved, which plays an important role in the anonymous funding dispute. On the basis of the empirical analysis of the existing arbitration instruments, this paper compares and reviews the mainstream principal-agent and trust mechanisms in academia and puts forward feasible solutions to the problems and related suggestions.