论文部分内容阅读
由于公共政策制定者与行政裁量实施者具有高度重合性,以及相较于法律规范公共政策具有灵活多变等品性,使得公共政策在行政裁量中一直担当着至关重要的角色。公共政策进入行政裁量过程之中,能够对行政裁量起到提升行政效率与裁量怠惰、政策规避等正反两方面的效应。据此将公共政策在行政裁量中应有的角色定位界定为公共政策是特定条件下的行政裁量依据,行政裁量自我规制的准则,并以规范性文件的前置审查制度保障公共政策的合法性、民主性和科学性;以裁量基准制度实现公共政策对行政裁量的正确引导;以司法审查制度保证行政裁量中政策适用的公正性来规范作为行政裁量考量依据的公共政策,促进行政裁量权的正当行使。
Public policy makers play a crucial role in administrative discretion due to the high coincidence between public policy makers and the implementers of administrative adjudication and the flexible nature of public policy as compared with the law. When public policy enters into the process of administrative discretion, it can exert positive and negative effects on administrative discretion, such as administrative efficiency and discretionary laxity and policy evasion. Based on this, the role of public policy in administrative discretion should be defined as the public policy is the basis of administrative discretion under certain conditions and the criterion of self-regulation of administrative discretion, and the legitimacy of public policy is guaranteed by the pre-censorship system of normative documents , Democratic and scientific; using the benchmarking system of discretion to realize the correct guidance of public policies on administrative discretion; using the judicial review system to ensure the fairness of the application of policies in administrative discretion to standardize the public policies as the basis for administrative discretion and promote the administrative discretion Exercise properly.