论文部分内容阅读
从当代中国的法治实践出发,可以构建出一套“转型法理学”的理论路径。不同于主流的规范法理学路径。转型法理学是一种以“有效治理”为中心、以二元合法性间的张力为主轴、以组织化调控与科层制治理间的矛盾关系为具体分析对象、以“政党国家”主导下的“综合治理观”为指引的分析框架。转型法理学在秉持转型政治时问观的前提下,预设了一种“国家中心主义”立场,提倡“治理的经济学”原则和“转型权利论”视角,主张在法理学研究中找回国家。转型法理学并不试图取代规范法理学,而是坚持在批判、反思后者的基础上实现二者间的有机结合与有效互补。
From the practice of the rule of law in contemporary China, we can construct a set of theoretical pathways of “transitional jurisprudence.” Different from the mainstream normative jurisprudence path. The transitional jurisprudence is a kind of research centering on “effective governance ” as the center, taking the tension between duality legitimacy as the main axis and the contradiction between the organizational regulation and bureaucratic governance as the specific analysis object, “Under the guidance of ” comprehensive management concept “as the guideline of the analytical framework. Under the precondition of upholding the concept of political transition in transition, the transitional jurisprudence presupposes a ”national centralism“ stance, advocating the principle of ”economics of governance“ and the theory of ”transitional rights" Recover the country from jurisprudence research. Instead of trying to replace normative jurisprudence, transitional jurisprudence insists on achieving the organic combination and effective complementarity between the two on the basis of criticism and reflection on the latter.