论文部分内容阅读
2005年《政法论坛》基于学术立场,特辟专栏对1949年以后的中国政法学术研究现状展开了讨论,其中,邓正来教授的《中国法学向何处去》这篇长文所提出的“中国为什么会缺失中国自己的法律理想图景”,“中国法学赖以为凭的支援性理据是什么”等问题引起了一系列争论、回应、批评甚或反批评。本刊认为,《中国法学向何处去》一文的意义至少指向了中国法学知识生产的主体性、能力、方式、技术等问题。勿庸置疑,这些问题关系着中国政法学术的体面与尊严。为此,本刊特约请法学界不同学科的学人从自己的专业或研究领域出发,以“笔谈”的形式进一步拓展这种讨论。从本期开始,本刊将陆续登载这方面的稿件,并期待您的加入和赐稿。
On the basis of academic position and the special column in 2005, the special column discussed the current status of China’s political and legal academic research after 1949, in which Professor Deng Zhenglai’s article entitled “Where Does Chinese Jurisprudence Go?” Will be missing a picture of China’s own legal ideal, “and” what is the justification of China’s jurisprudence on the grounds of support? “And other issues caused a series of controversies, responses, criticisms or even anti-criticisms. The journal holds that the meaning of ”where does Jurisprudence of China go?“ At least points to such issues as the subjectivity, ability, mode, and technology of legal knowledge production in China. Undoubtedly, these issues are related to the decentness and dignity of Chinese politics and law. To this end, we specifically invite scholars from different disciplines in the field of law to proceed from their fields of specialization or research and to further expand this discussion in the form of ”written discussion." Starting from this issue, we will publish articles in this area one after another, and look forward to your joining and contribution.