论文部分内容阅读
确定性是语言在特定条件或语境下相对具体化的展现。法律规范的适用,是规范语词的模糊性和确定性相互调适和转化的过程。由此,阐释成为架通二者的必经桥梁。阐释中,应注重以法律规则或法律原则背后最小意义单元的价值为原点,通过意向性活动对蕴含着丰富内涵的价值进行多维度的勾连和整合,进而,在阐释者与被阐释者的视域融合中形成同构共相体。同时,在众多复杂因素的交互作用下,围绕相互趋同的价值轴心,通过多数议决或综合折洽机制,形成有机共识,从而获取具备社会整合功能的建构性结论。
Certainty is the manifestation of a relatively specific language or language in a particular context or context. The application of legal norms is the process of regulating the ambiguity and certainty of words in terms of mutual adjustment and transformation. As a result, it is necessary to explain why it is necessary to bridge the gap between the two. In the explanation, we should focus on the value of the smallest unit of meaning behind the legal rules or legal principles as the starting point, and conduct multi-dimensional concatenation and integration of the value with rich connotation through the intentional activity. Then, in the perspective of the interpreter and the interpreter Domain fusion to form isomorphic co-phase. At the same time, under the interaction of many complicated factors, the organic consensus is formed through majority settlement or comprehensive folding mechanism around the value axis of mutual convergence so as to obtain constructive conclusions with the function of social integration.