如果在日内瓦举行的美苏裁军会谈不能使苏联减少他部署的SS-20导弹,或者按所谓的“0点方案”将其SS-20导弹全部拆除的话,那么,迄今还没有任何计划象北约组织将要补充装备巡航导弹和潘兴Ⅱ式的计划那样在西方各国引起如此的不安,而北约这些武器系统的情况到底如何呢?据说它们至少可部分抵消华沙集团在该范围的优势。下面,笔者着重谈一下这个问题。“裁减军备应该对补充军备的行动负责吗?这个问题听起来颇荒谬,然而这又的确是事实,自从美苏把其洲际战略核能力拉到一个相近的水平之后,苏联欧洲战略导弹的质量又有 If the U.S.-Soviet disarmament talks held in Geneva do not enable the Soviet Union to reduce the number of SS-20 missiles deployed by the Soviet Union or completely demolish its SS-20 missiles according to the so-called “0-point plan,” so far no plan has been put in place like the NATO So much restlessness in the West will be caused by the replenishment of plans to equip cruise missiles and Pershing II, and what about the NATO arms system at the time? They are said to at least partially offset the Warsaw Group’s superiority in that area. Below, I focus on this issue. "It sounds absurd to say that the reduction of armaments should be responsible for the supplement of armaments. However, this is indeed a fact. Since the United States and the Soviet Union have pulled their intercontinental and strategic nuclear capabilities to a similar level, the quality of Soviet strategic missile in Europe Have