论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘的效果。方法 92例小儿哮喘患儿,随机分成观察组和对照组,各46例。观察组采用压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,对照组采用超声雾化吸入治疗,并对两组患儿的治疗效果进行对比分析。结果观察组患儿经治疗后总有效率为91.30%,优于对照组的71.74%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论选用压缩泵雾化吸入方式对小儿哮喘进行治疗,能有效改善患儿的呼吸状况,效果明显,值得推广。
Objective To explore the effect of different inhalation therapy on pediatric asthma. Methods 92 cases of children with asthma were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 46 cases each. The observation group was treated with compression pump atomization inhalation, the control group was treated with ultrasonic atomization inhalation, and the treatment effect of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group after treatment was 91.30%, which was better than 71.74% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Selection of compression pump atomization inhalation for pediatric asthma treatment, can effectively improve children’s respiratory status, the effect is obvious, it is worth promoting.