自从去年9月份《火花天地》刊登署名“花灯”的《严惩入侵之“花”》一文后,火花界又一次掀起了关于“商品花”问题的争论,引起了广大花友们的关注。事实上,有关这个话题的争论,以往已发生过多次,只不过这一次更加激烈罢了。本来,人们对某一事物持有不同的看法,“是很正常的;对其展开讨论(或争论),探求其真谛,也是一件好事。然而,这次的论争,一开始就不正常,《严惩》一文,不是以一种”学术探讨“的态度提出议题,而是 Since September last year, ”spark of heaven and earth“ published signature ”lantern “ ”sternly punish the invasion of “ ”, the spark community once again set off on the “ commodity flower ”debate, causing the majority of flowers Friends attention. In fact, the debate on this topic has taken place in the past many times, but this time it is even more intense. Originally, people held different opinions about something, “it is quite normal; it is also a good thing to discuss (or argue) with them and explore their true meaning.” However, this debate was not normal from the beginning , “Severely punished” article, not in a “academic discussion ” attitude proposed the issue, but