吕不韋主持編撰的《吕氏春秋》,學界對其學派屬性與學術定位,一直説法不一。究其原因,主要是忽略了戰國後期中國學術思想上出現的一個重大變化,這就是伴隨著政治上大一統的即將實現,學術思想上出現了一個百家合流的大趨勢。在這個大趨勢中,最爲突出的就是黄老思潮的勃興。自馬王堆出土四篇《黄老帛書》之後,黄老之學的研究受到學界重視。《吕氏春秋》的學派屬性與學術定位,因此也就變得越來越清晰。孫以楷主編的《道家與中國哲學》(先秦卷),認爲“《吕氏春秋》應屬黄老之 Lv Buwei presided over the compilation of ”Lu’s Spring and Autumn“, the academic community has its own attributes and academic positioning, has been different. The reason is mainly to overlook a major change in Chinese academic thought in the late Warring States period, which is accompanied by the impending realization of the great political unification and the emergence of a hundred-trend convergence in academic thinking. In this general trend, the most prominent is the rise of the Huang-Lao ideological trend. After unearthed four ”Huang Lao silk books“ from Mawangdui, the study of Huang Lao Zhi’s school has drawn much attention from scholars. ”Lu’s Spring and Autumn“ School attribute and academic positioning, it will become more clear. Edited by Sun Yikai, ”Taoism and Chinese Philosophy“ (Pre-Qin volumes), that ”“ Lu’s Spring and Autumn ”should belong to Huang Laozhi