论文部分内容阅读
后现代艺术中,有两件作品,一是美术领域的《泉》,就是那个进人展厅的著名小便器,一是音乐领域的《四分三十秒》,著名的无声音乐,这两件作品表达思想感情的方式(或者说机制)与传统的艺术作品有很大不同,相应地,对它们的解读方式也迥然不同。传统解读方式往往可以就作品本身说很多话,发掘其中的微言大义,而且作品本身也往往具有一定的实体性,经受得起这样的考察,作品与读者之间是“对话”关系。但是,这种解读方式运用在上述两件作品中却不大恰当,甚至相当荒谬可笑——我
In postmodern art, there are two works, one is the “spring” in the art field, the famous urinal which enters the exhibition hall, the “four minutes and thirty seconds” in the music field, the famous silent music, and the two pieces The ways (or mechanisms) in which works express their feelings and emotions are quite different from the traditional works of art. Correspondingly, the way they are interpreted is also very different. The traditional way of interpretation can often talk a lot about the work itself, discover the meanings of the works, and the works themselves tend to have some substantive characteristics. They can withstand such investigations and the relationship between the works and the readers is “dialogue.” However, it is not appropriate or even absurd to apply this interpretation to the above two works - I