论文部分内容阅读
美术界这几年流行“学术性”三字经。几个画种先后提出“学术性”作为发表、入展、颁奖时的主要评审标准,甚至是最高尺码。新概念乍一提出,不免光彩照人。 任何个人、群体,读画、评画时设定标准择优汰劣,天经地义而无可厚非,古往今来自有通例。南齐谢赫提出了气韵生动、骨法用笔、应物象形、随类赋彩、经营位置、传移模写的六法。唐代朱景玄提出了神、妙、能、逸的四品。五代荆浩提出了气、韵、思、景、笔、墨的六要。清
In recent years, art circles have become popular academic syllables. Several paintings have put forward “academic” as the main evaluation criteria, even the maximum size when publishing, entering the exhibition, awards. The new concept was first proposed, inevitably brilliant. Any individual, group, painting, painting set the standard selection excellence, judicious and understandable, ancient and modern come from the usual. Nancy Sheikh put forward a vivid charm, bone method pen, should be the object shape, with the class color, operating position, transfer mode write six. Zhu Jingxuan put forward the god of the Tang Dynasty, wonderful, can, Yi four products. Five generations of Jing Hao proposed gas, rhyme, thinking, King, pen, ink six. clear