论文部分内容阅读
我国《民事诉讼法》第151条规定:“第二审人民法院应当对上诉请求的有关事实和适用法律进行审查”。这一条文是对《民事诉讼法(试行)》第149条规定“第二审人民法院必须全面审查第一审人民法院认定的事实和适用的法律,不受上诉范围的限制”的重大修改。但是,对《民事诉讼法》第151条的规定,在审判实践中如何适用还存在不同的理解。笔者就此谈些看法。第一审人民法院判决后,当事人提起上诉主要有两种情况:其一是对一审判决的内容全部上诉;其二是对一审判决的内容部分上诉,里面又有三种情形:一是部分上诉的内容,一审处理可能存在错
Article 151 of China’s Civil Procedure Law stipulates: “The people’s court of second instance shall examine the relevant facts and applicable laws of the appeal request.” This provision is a drastic amendment to Article 149 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Provisional) stipulating that “the people’s court of second instance must conduct a comprehensive review of the facts and applicable laws found by the people’s court of first instance and not be bound by the scope of the appeal.” However, there is still a different understanding of how the provisions of Article 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply in trial practice. I talk about this view. After the judgment of the people’s court at the first instance, there are mainly two situations in which the parties filed an appeal: one is to appeal all the contents of the judgment of the first instance, and the other is to appeal the partial contents of the judgment of the first instance. There are three situations in which the appeal is partially appealed Content, first instance processing may be wrong