在司法实践中,当事人所提证据材料若与证明对象没有证明关系,我们一般会通过否认其关联性,将此项证据材料排除在证据之外。但是如果此证据对整个案件事实有证明作用,则不能草率的下结论。造成这种困境的原因是由于理论上对证据关联性的参照标准的研究还不全面,学者们习惯在更高的层面展开论述,本文就紧紧围绕关联性的参照标准及相关的几个问题进行探讨,以期对司法实践有所帮助。 In judicial practice, if the evidences submitted by the parties have no relationship with the object of proof, we usually exclude the evidence from the evidence by denying the relevance. However, if the evidence is a testimony to the facts of the case, you can not make a hasty conclusion. This dilemma is caused by the fact that the research on the reference standard for the relevance of evidence is not comprehensive in theory, and the scholars are accustomed to discussing at a higher level. This article closely centers on the reference standards of relevance and several related issues To discuss, with a view to judicial practice helpful.