论文部分内容阅读
《纽约时报》2016年8月7日刊登了埃里克·利普顿和布鲁克·威廉姆斯的署名文章,题为《独立的研究机构还是企业资助的推手:界限模糊的美国“智库”》。文章深入调查了以布鲁金斯学会为代表的著名智库与多家商业企业达成的利益合作关系,认为所谓的捐款和“资助”将不可避免地对智库及其研究的独立性、客观性造成负面影响。深受政府和社会信任的智库,一旦丧失其独立性和客观性,将导致其研究成果向出资的利益集团刻意倾斜,逐步沦为在后者授意下进行鼓吹的工具,最终可能危及国家和民族的整体、长远利益,导致不可挽回、难以估量的严重后果。2015年1月20日。中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发《关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见》。本文对于将我国智库纳入法治化、制度化、规范化的建设轨道,具有一定的借鉴和警示作用。埃里克·利普顿为《纽约时报》华盛顿分社记者,曾获2015年度普利策新闻奖,布鲁克·威廉姆斯为新英格兰调查报道中心资深调研员,曾获2014年度普利策新闻奖。
The New York Times published a signed essay by Eric Lipton and Brooke Williams on August 7, 2016, titled “An Independent Research Organization Or a Business-Sponsored Pusher: Blurred America ” Think Tank “”. The article investigates in depth the cooperation relationship between the well-known think tanks represented by the Brookings Institution and a number of commercial enterprises and holds that the so-called contributions and subsidies will inevitably have an impact on the independence and objectivity of think tanks and their research Sex has a negative impact. A think tank trusted deeply by the government and society, once it loses its independence and objectivity, will cause its research results to be deliberately tilted toward the interest groups it invests in, gradually becoming a tool advocated under the latter’s will, which may endanger the nation and nation The overall long-term interests lead to irreparable and unforgiving serious consequences. January 20, 2015. The General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council have printed and distributed the Opinions on Strengthening the Construction of a New Type of Think Tank with Chinese Characteristics. This article has some reference and warning function to bring our think tank into the track of legalization, institutionalization and standardization. Eric Lipton, New York Times Washington Branch correspondent, won the 2015 Pulitzer Prize for News, Brooke Williams, a veteran investigator for the New England Investigative Reporting Center, won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for News .