本刊第三期有一则书讯,题为《揭露苏修的一本新书》。乍一看题,我以为是苏修出了一本“新书”,本文的目的在于“揭露”这本“新书”。然而,读完全文,方才知道,文章的意图在于介绍“一本新书”,而这本“新书”是“揭露苏修的”。看来,用题不准确会给读者带来一些不便,可以使读者产生两种不同的理解。望写稿的同志注意这 The third issue of this magazine has a book entitled “expose a new book Soviet revisionism.” At first glance, I thought it was the Soviet revisionist “new book”, the purpose of this article is to “expose” this “new book.” However, after reading the full text, I just learned that the article’s intent was to introduce “a new book,” which is “exposing Soviet revisionism.” It seems that inaccurate questions will give the reader some inconvenience, can make the reader have two different understandings. Comrade looking manuscripts pay attention to this